Wizard Recommends
If you plan to play table games such as blackjack, craps, baccarat, poker, or roulette, practice online before trying it at a casino with real money. When you play a game such as craps or roulette, in which chips are flying and some bets are made by gestures, you might assume the other players know more than you do.
- Lot better table manners and poker etiquette in 5/10 - This point is debatable. But usually the 5/10 players have sustained many sessions of big losses and wins. They don't get upset over a suck out or two. They're able to handle swings and bad runs more professionally than the recreational 2/5 players.
- Bravo Poker Live is the world's most convenient, secure and low cost poker event registration portal on the web. More than just a booking site, Bravo Poker Live communicates directly with our industry leading poker room management system installed in leading casinos across the world - giving you registration access like never before!
- €1500 Welcome Bonus
- €100 + 300 Free Spins
- 100% Welcome Bonus
On This Page
Introduction
The following table shows the house edge of most casino games. For games partially of skill perfect play is assumed. See below the table for a definition of the house edge.
Casino Game House Edge
Game | Bet/Rules | House Edge | Standard Deviation |
---|---|---|---|
Baccarat | Banker | 1.06% | 0.93 |
Player | 1.24% | 0.95 | |
Tie | 14.36% | 2.64 | |
Big Six | $1 | 11.11% | 0.99 |
$2 | 16.67% | 1.34 | |
$5 | 22.22% | 2.02 | |
$10 | 18.52% | 2.88 | |
$20 | 22.22% | 3.97 | |
Joker/Logo | 24.07% | 5.35 | |
Bonus Six | No insurance | 10.42% | 5.79 |
With insurance | 23.83% | 6.51 | |
Blackjacka | Liberal Vegas rules | 0.28% | 1.15 |
Caribbean Stud Poker | 5.22% | 2.24 | |
Casino War | Go to war on ties | 2.88% | 1.05 |
Surrender on ties | 3.70% | 0.94 | |
Bet on tie | 18.65% | 8.32 | |
Catch a Wave | 0.50% | d | |
Craps | Pass/Come | 1.41% | 1.00 |
Don't pass/don't come | 1.36% | 0.99 | |
Odds — 4 or 10 | 0.00% | 1.41 | |
Odds — 5 or 9 | 0.00% | 1.22 | |
Odds — 6 or 8 | 0.00% | 1.10 | |
Field (2:1 on 12) | 5.56% | 1.08 | |
Field (3:1 on 12) | 2.78% | 1.14 | |
Any craps | 11.11% | 2.51 | |
Big 6,8 | 9.09% | 1.00 | |
Hard 4,10 | 11.11% | 2.51 | |
Hard 6,8 | 9.09% | 2.87 | |
Place 6,8 | 1.52% | 1.08 | |
Place 5,9 | 4.00% | 1.18 | |
Place 4,10 | 6.67% | 1.32 | |
Place (to lose) 4,10 | 3.03% | 0.69 | |
2, 12, & all hard hops | 13.89% | 5.09 | |
3, 11, & all easy hops | 11.11% | 3.66 | |
Any seven | 16.67% | 1.86 | |
Double Down Stud | 2.67% | 2.97 | |
Heads Up Hold 'Em | Blind pay table #1 (500-50-10-8-5) | 2.36% | 4.56 |
Keno | 25%-29% | 1.30-46.04 | |
Let it Ride | 3.51% | 5.17 | |
Pai Gowc | 1.50% | 0.75 | |
Pai Gow Pokerc | 1.46% | 0.75 | |
Pick ’em Poker | 0% - 10% | 3.87 | |
Red Dog | Six decks | 2.80% | 1.60 |
Roulette | Single Zero | 2.70% | e |
Double Zero | 5.26% | e | |
Sic-Bo | 2.78%-33.33% | e | |
Slot Machines | 2%-15%f | 8.74g | |
Spanish 21 | Dealer hits soft 17 | 0.76% | d |
Dealer stands on soft 17 | 0.40% | d | |
Super Fun 21 | 0.94% | d | |
Three Card Poker | Pairplus | 7.28% | 2.85 |
Ante & play | 3.37% | 1.64 | |
Video Poker | Jacks or Better (Full Pay) | 0.46% | 4.42 |
Wild Hold ’em Fold ’em | 6.86% | d |
Notes
a | Liberal Vegas Strip rules: Dealer stands on soft 17, player may double on any two cards, player may double after splitting, resplit aces, late surrender. |
b | Las Vegas single deck rules are dealer hits on soft 17, player may double on any two cards, player may not double after splitting, one card to split aces, no surrender. |
c | Assuming player plays the house way, playing one on one against dealer, and half of bets made are as banker. |
d | Yet to be determined. |
e | Standard deviation depends on bet made. |
f | Slot machine range is based on available returns from a major manufacturer |
g | Slot machine standard deviation based on just one machine. While this can vary, the standard deviation on slot machines are very high. |
House Edge
The house edge is defined as the ratio of the average loss to the initial bet. The house edge is not the ratio of money lost to total money wagered. In some games the beginning wager is not necessarily the ending wager. For example in blackjack, let it ride, and Caribbean stud poker, the player may increase their bet when the odds favor doing so. In these cases the additional money wagered is not figured into the denominator for the purpose of determining the house edge, thus increasing the measure of risk.
The reason that the house edge is relative to the original wager, not the average wager, is that it makes it easier for the player to estimate how much they will lose. For example if a player knows the house edge in blackjack is 0.6% he can assume that for every $10 wager original wager he makes he will lose 6 cents on the average. Most players are not going to know how much their average wager will be in games like blackjack relative to the original wager, thus any statistic based on the average wager would be difficult to apply to real life questions.
The conventional definition can be helpful for players determine how much it will cost them to play, given the information they already know. However the statistic is very biased as a measure of risk. In Caribbean stud poker, for example, the house edge is 5.22%, which is close to that of double zero roulette at 5.26%. However the ratio of average money lost to average money wagered in Caribbean stud is only 2.56%. The player only looking at the house edge may be indifferent between roulette and Caribbean stud poker, based only the house edge. If one wants to compare one game against another I believe it is better to look at the ratio of money lost to money wagered, which would show Caribbean stud poker to be a much better gamble than roulette.
Many other sources do not count ties in the house edge calculation, especially for the Don’t Pass bet in craps and the banker and player bets in baccarat. The rationale is that if a bet isn’t resolved then it should be ignored. I personally opt to include ties although I respect the other definition.
Element of Risk
For purposes of comparing one game to another I would like to propose a different measurement of risk, which I call the 'element of risk.' This measurement is defined as the average loss divided by total money bet. For bets in which the initial bet is always the final bet there would be no difference between this statistic and the house edge. Bets in which there is a difference are listed below.
Element of Risk
Game | Bet | House Edge | Element of Risk |
---|---|---|---|
Blackjack | Atlantic City rules | 0.43% | 0.38% |
Bonus 6 | No insurance | 10.42% | 5.41% |
Bonus 6 | With insurance | 23.83% | 6.42% |
Caribbean Stud Poker | 5.22% | 2.56% | |
Casino War | Go to war on ties | 2.88% | 2.68% |
Heads Up Hold 'Em | Pay Table #1 (500-50-10-8-5) | 2.36% | 0.64% |
Double Down Stud | 2.67% | 2.13% | |
Let it Ride | 3.51% | 2.85% | |
Spanish 21 | Dealer hits soft 17 | 0.76% | 0.65% |
Spanish 21 | Dealer stands on soft 17 | 0.40% | 0.30% |
Three Card Poker | Ante & play | 3.37% | 2.01% |
Wild Hold ’em Fold ’em | 6.86% | 3.23% |
Standard Deviation
The standard deviation is a measure of how volatile your bankroll will be playing a given game. This statistic is commonly used to calculate the probability that the end result of a session of a defined number of bets will be within certain bounds.
The standard deviation of the final result over n bets is the product of the standard deviation for one bet (see table) and the square root of the number of initial bets made in the session. This assumes that all bets made are of equal size. The probability that the session outcome will be within one standard deviation is 68.26%. The probability that the session outcome will be within two standard deviations is 95.46%. The probability that the session outcome will be within three standard deviations is 99.74%. The following table shows the probability that a session outcome will come within various numbers of standard deviations.
That is very irritating when you win a large amount and then do not get anything. https://mmolucky.netlify.app/big-fish-casino-flex-2.html.
I realize that this explanation may not make much sense to someone who is not well versed in the basics of statistics. If this is the case I would recommend enriching yourself with a good introductory statistics book.
Standard Deviation
Number | Probability |
---|---|
0.25 | 0.1974 |
0.50 | 0.3830 |
0.75 | 0.5468 |
1.00 | 0.6826 |
1.25 | 0.7888 |
1.50 | 0.8664 |
1.75 | 0.9198 |
2.00 | 0.9546 |
2.25 | 0.9756 |
2.50 | 0.9876 |
2.75 | 0.9940 |
3.00 | 0.9974 |
3.25 | 0.9988 |
3.50 | 0.9996 |
3.75 | 0.9998 |
Hold
Although I do not mention hold percentages on my site the term is worth defining because it comes up a lot. The hold percentage is the ratio of chips the casino keeps to the total chips sold. This is generally measured over an entire shift. For example if blackjack table x takes in $1000 in the drop box and of the $1000 in chips sold the table keeps $300 of them (players walked away with the other $700) then the game's hold is 30%. If every player loses their entire purchase of chips then the hold will be 100%. It is possible for the hold to exceed 100% if players carry to the table chips purchased at another table. A mathematician alone can not determine the hold because it depends on how long the player will sit at the table and the same money circulates back and forth. There is a lot of confusion between the house edge and hold, especially among casino personnel.
Hands per Hour, House Edge for Comp Purposes
The following table shows the average hands per hour and the house edge for comp purposes various games. The house edge figures are higher than those above, because the above figures assume optimal strategy, and those below reflect player errors and average type of bet made. This table was given to me anonymously by an executive with a major Strip casino and is used for rating players.
Hands per Hour and Average House Edge
Games | Hands/Hour | House Edge |
---|---|---|
Baccarat | 72 | 1.2% |
Blackjack | 70 | 0.75% |
Big Six | 10 | 15.53% |
Craps | 48 | 1.58% |
Car. Stud | 50 | 1.46% |
Let It Ride | 52 | 2.4% |
Mini-Baccarat | 72 | 1.2% |
Midi-Baccarat | 72 | 1.2% |
Pai Gow | 30 | 1.65% |
Pai Pow Poker | 34 | 1.96% |
Roulette | 38 | 5.26% |
Single 0 Roulette | 35 | 2.59% |
Casino War | 65 | 2.87% |
Spanish 21 | 75 | 2.2% |
Sic Bo | 45 | 8% |
3 Way Action | 70 | 2.2% |
Translation
A Spanish translation of this page is available at www.eldropbox.com. https://mmolucky.netlify.app/gaurdian-slot-machine-games.html.
Those boards, or expansion cards, plug directly into expansion slots on 5 Port USB PCI Card Bracket Expansion Slot Card Adapter for Computer PC:For their 1000 EX and 1000 HX models, Tandy Computer designed the PLUS expansion interface, an adaptation of the XT-bus supporting cards of a smaller form factor. https://mmolucky.netlify.app/expansion-slots-and-their-functions.html. ISA Industry Standard Architecture slots were once standard on all PCs.Send to group Send this link to let others join your presentation:The standard (now at version 30) is found on PC motherboards to this day.
Written by: Michael Shackleford
Poker Seeing Which Casino Has Tables Going Away
3-card poker’s pretty new compared to other casino card games. A guy named Derek Webb invented the game in 1994.
Shortly after he invented it, he started shopping it around to different casinos to see if anyone would be willing to offer it in their casino on a trial basis.
After a few rejections, Webb got a bite from a casino in Mississippi. There, Derek hustled; he helped integrate the game into the casino and train the dealers, all at no cost.
Webb later parlayed his initial success into trials with Las Vegas and Reno casinos. Between pitching his game and training staff, he was kept busy. Life was looking good.
Then he was hit by a patent infringement lawsuit from Progressive Games.
Derek then met with Joseph Lahti, the president of Shuffle Master. Lahti offered to help Webb defend the patent claims in court.
He also offered Webb $3 million for partial rights to 3-card poker – which Webb agreed to.
But there was a chance Derek could have gotten a lot more. So, he countersued Progressive Games. He claimed their lawsuit against him forced him to sell his (intellectual) property at a lower price than it’d be worth otherwise.
Progressive Games must have thought so, too. Or they didn’t want to see what a judge and jury would think. Because they settled out of court…
…and paid Derek Webb $20 million.
Poker Seeing Which Casino Has Tables Going Together
It sounds like we should be investing in games instead of writing about them, doesn’t it?
Poker Seeing Which Casino Has Tables Going Back
Anyway, that’s the short and sweet story about where 3-card poker comes from. Now let’s take a few minutes to learn how to play it.